Thursday, May 28, 2009

Addressing the Blisters

So I am sitting at a coffee shop next to a couple of intertwined hippie-children bumming their way around the country and some wholesome, granola-pretty people who "just love Jesus." 

Suddenly I am wanting to write.

But, this is a false-start blog. I already began an entry that I immediately deleted. One about the creative process, my life and thoughts, how I wanted to write when I knew I should be completing one of the eight million tasks scheduled into my life between now and a little while from now, blah, blah, blah. I was bored with it immediately and deleted the whole thing. 

And so, I randomly went to the google box in the right hand corner of my screen and typed in what felt necessary. Confessions from a sex addict.

Suddenly I was reading an account from a man destroyed by his compulsion to masturbate and buy pornography. A man who felt so guilty for his actions that he tried to avoid breathing around women in order to avoid inhaling the smell of their perfume. It sounded crazy. It sounded so sad.

And I couldn't help thinking--I married someone like this. Different of course, in many ways, but similar, too. 

*****

Lately a rash has reappeared on my finger. My ring finger. It began two years ago around this time, three months before I knew I wanted to divorce my husband. My husband who bought pornography compulsively and lied to me constantly. 

I haven't worn a ring in 22 months and my finger is still breaking out in a rash.


I have tried talking about this to people who might be helpful but no one seems to have any good insight about the matter. "Quit wearing your old ring," said a friend when I told him. "That's really weird," said a friend who is a chiropractor. "Are you allergic to your earrings?" she asked.

Of course I said no.

The thing is- I know why my finger keeps breaking out. I know it's because there is material that needs to surface. 

It's not love.

Or at least, it's not love in the sense that tends to make sense. Not love in the sense that I want to reconcile with my ex-husband. Not love in the sense that I miss him from my life. I miss him, sure, but I have no desire to ever kiss him again. No desire to lay in his arms. I feel sad saying that and I miss laying in someone's arms, but I know I will never want to be with him again. 

I know because when I found out he was still lying to me, nearly two years ago, I became immune to him. I didn't want his skin touching mine. I thought about trust before bed and woke up with the word severed on my lips. A word, hanging, suspended in the air, letting me know we had reached the end.

I trust myself to know when something is over. Every fiber in my body screeches to a halt.

And yet, the rash.

The frustrating thing is that this is my subject. I think this is the topic I have to sit with some more. And it is so frustrating because I so want to be done. I hate that I think about how sexual obsession affects people, both the people obsessed and the ones who love them. I hate thinking about how I compromised values for the sake of a relationship. I hate analyzing my own relationship to sex and intimacy and the patterns that originated in my own past.

Most people have patterns ingrained in their brain about sexuality by the time they are five.

I don't want to be the one to figure this out.

I want to be the one blithely living my new life. Forgetting my past. Going on dates. Wearing high heels and walking into the future. Smiling. Happy. Pretending the marriage, like my earlier blog, was just a false start. A random mistake. The accident of a very young woman. Maybe I was just too young to know better.

Instead, my itchy finger is reminding me there are still words that need to be said. The word severed came to me and hovered in the air, letting me know we had reached the end. But there are more words bubbling up in blisters between knuckles and fist letting me know I'm not done.

It so pisses me off.

Maybe this summer I will start to move on. Maybe I will write enough to get away from this subject. Maybe this summer my finger will heal. Maybe this summer, maybe...
 well, I can't say what comes next.

The Clumsy Journey to Wherever It Is That I Am Supposed to Be

Lately startling questions have come into my life.

One occurred while I was sitting on my apartment patio Memorial weekend drinking a beer after work and catching up on emails on my laptop, yorkie-poo at my feet. A friend, one I had been on a date with earlier in the year, joined me while waiting for his cab to come and take him away to a rooftop party downtown. He leaned in to me, open after a day of holiday drinking on a bar's patio, and said "Can I ask you a question?" I nodded. "Are you into girls?" I raised my eyebrows and shook my head. "Because I never see you with any guys. Why don't you have a boyfriend? It's time, you know? You should just try to trust someone. They're not all bad. One out of five. I'd say you can trust one out of five men. With women it's a little different. More like three out of five."

One out of five, I found myself thinking. Yeah, right. 

Another question occurred when I was talking to a friend of mine about feelings and issues and concerns, etc, etc, (all of the stuff I am really awkward and uncomfortable with) and he said, in response, "Why are you so serious all the time?" 

I bristled and steered the conversation back to the topic, but the remark stayed in the soft gray area of my consciousness.

And finally, at work, where I am currently a waitress, one of the regular customers stopped me as I was passing his table with a pot of coffee. This 70-ish gentleman moved his cup to the side of the table and said, "Say, I want to ask you a question. What do you want..." he moved his cup again, "to do with your life?" 

As it was 9am and I was a waitress working on her second master's and holding a pot of coffee and just done with mopping the floor, I didn't exactly warm up to this question. 

In fact- I didn't warm up to any of the questions. Who were these men to be asking me such weighty questions? Did I question their judgment? Their choices in life? Their decisions or lifestyle? No- of course not. What right did they have to judge my life? Or expect more from it?

As I thought about the questions more they irritated me even more. Why do I need to trust men again? Who says I'm serious all the time? Why do I need a plan for my life? And, more importantly, how is that anyone's business other than my own?

As I got riled up I started writing a blog in my mind about the audacity of these questions and the pretentiousness of the people asking them. The blog would end, of course, after analyzing this situation with a I-am-woman-hear-me-roar type of triumphant closing. Something like I like who I am and how I am content with my choices and I don't want a boyfriend and I'm not too serious and my life will be whatever it is meant to be and it will be perfect in that sense.

But then I realized the mental blog I had written would not work.

It was a lie.

The truth, if I dare to write it, is that I bristled at these questions not because of the people asking them. Not because I felt I shouldn't have to answer to anyone. Not because I had an answer to each of the questions.

I bristled because they are questions I ask myself. Or questions I would ask of myself if I were brave enough.

The truth is that I do want a boyfriend. The truth is that I am scared to trust again. The truth is that I do wonder why I have to so seriously analyze my life all the time. It is like I am hyperaware of all of my many imperfections all of the time. And the truth is I don't want to be like this. I want to go back to a life where I don't have to work so hard to be honest. Sometimes I think I might prefer the life of complacency and permanent mild dissatisfaction. Why not settle? Allow myself to drift into a relationship with one of the men I have gone on first dates with--the men with checklists who after a thorough two-hour interview almost visually decide things could work out between us. The men who are looking for a certain accessory to add to their individually crafted lives. It would be easy. I could stop feeling lonely. We could date and then live together and then get married and have kids and share space and exist in sort-of companion style life. All I would have to do is adjust to his life. 

Or--I suppose I must look for another option--why not try to trust someone who does know me for who I am? Why not let someone see me as myself?

The truth is that this is the scariest situation of all. Because the truth is that I am the sort of woman who accidentally almost starts her paper coffee cup on fire while heating it up in the microwave. I am the sort of woman who rebels and adopts the mantras of self-help books in the same minute. I am the sort of woman who takes herself seriously, who worries about making the same mistakes over again. I am the sort of woman who would get into a car accident before she would share her feelings. I am the sort of woman who has a dirty shower and snores and feels confused and doesn't know what she's going to do with her life and trips sometimes over the cracks in the sidewalk and who wants to let someone into her life again but has no idea how to do it. 

"Why don't you go talk to that guy?" my apartment friend said to me on Memorial weekend, nodding at another man drinking a beer and watching the baseball game from his chair. And so I did. Not because I was particularly attracted to him or excited to meet him (in fact I sensed a checklist from 20 feet), but because, when all is said and done, I am also the sort of woman who keeps trying. 

It's bound to get easier with practice. I hope. 

Sunday, May 3, 2009

What I Am...

What  I am is sitting in my apartment and typing on my computer, eyes heavy from allergies and lack of sleep, body sore from soccer and running and standing eight hours at a time. I am tight-stomach sitting in my parents’ car on the way to a Twins’ game. I am strange dreams and strange sleeping. I am singing out loud in a coffee shop and cutting up my work, reassembling it in an updraft, a second draft, a current, a magic-wire I’ve plugged into, my wi-fi to the universe. I am smiling to earn money. I am smiling because I want to. I am sitting on a bar stool wanting every guy in the room to want me. I am sitting on a bar stool thinking there is not a single guy here that I want. I am looking at a stranger’s brown eyes and dreading my past. I am wanting so badly to see the future.

I am counting markers lining the lake where I run. Counting down the moments until the finish. Counting the couples walking past me. Counting the strollers. The groups of friends playing volleyball. Counting my single female friends— one.

I am worried about what I have said. What I have shared. What I have written. Who sees what I write. Who hears what I say. So many secrets spill out of corners. So much of me tumbles out into the world. So much held back for so long.

What tumbles out? You, of course. Ex-husband. And lately I realize maybe the until-death-do-us-part never even started until I left. You tumble out of my mouth in words, in front of friends, strangers. And it’s not that I want you back—it’s that by losing you I found me.

I guess I should thank you for that.

                                    Words that Still Hurt:

                                    Porn

                                    Addiction

                                    Lies

                                    Good-bye

                                    Family

                                    Babies

                                    Alone

 

What I am is lonely. What I am is scared I will never connect with a good man. Scared there are no good men. Scared I will forever fall into the trap of cute-fun-guys-who-sort-of-adore-me-for-a-time-before-they-ultimately-prove-they-can’t-love-me.

What I am is ashamed. Ashamed of being lonely. Of feeling sadness. Of being weak. Of being vulnerable. Of needing people. Of not being tough enough on my own. I am ashamed to admit I feel sad. Ashamed I can’t find happiness in the world alone. Ashamed I am not enough to keep people in my life. Ashamed that when I set boundaries, people disappear.

What I am is lonely-when-I-see-couples-with-strollers, but at least I am not lonely-when-lying-in-bed-with-my-husband. I am bruised knees and bruised feelings but I am also singing in coffee shops and singing at ball games. I am scared to want a relationship and scared I will never have one again. I am wanting to look at my past and dreading it. I am laughing and I am surviving and I am laughing and evading. I am smiling because I love you and smiling because I want so badly to be loved. I am severed and turning myself inside out. Or maybe just now outgrowing my shell.


You may not see it.

But this is what I am.


And so far I have no regrets.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

What You Are Not

I saw you running around the lake on Saturday. You were not looking at me. Or maybe you were, but not when I was looking at you, when I was seeing you jog to the left of me and when I followed your back into the distance. I was not trying to remember your breathing. I was trying not to think of the music on your ipod. Not noticing the clothing that you wore, the clothing that used to intermingle with mine in our dryer, on our limbs.

            I was trying not to notice these things because you are not in my life. You are not in my bed each night. You are not walking in the door with a little smile on your face. You are not calling me goofy or teasing me for spilling and being clumsy. You are not walking with me in twilit evenings on new-family blocks. You are not telling me about the starlings who chased you on your run.

            You are not in my bed but you are no longer missing from bed either. You are not lying to me. You are not lying to me. You are not lying to me.

           

I guess because you are not lying to me it makes me miss you lying next to me. I guess because you are not in my life, I cannot help wondering where in life you are. Where are you in this universe? Besides running away in front of me, being exactly where you should not. 

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Reviewing the Evidence

How do I enter this space- this space I want to write about? 

For weeks I have been contemplating a memoir selection for class. My Eureka!-moment suggested a structure built on a tornado of grief, swirling in and around the five stages grief I experienced and experience over the end of my marriage. 

What I am finding is five stages can't hold my grief. Can't begin to address addiction. Can't possibly contain my story.

Thus- I am left without a stage, but with a thought. An elegiac memory. A picture of denial. Could they both be true? Could both exist truly at one shared instant?

The instant is a photograph.
Rather, a series of photographs. 
Taken by my ex.
On my birthday.

In the series of eight photographs, I am wearing a black dress draping over my shoulders, nearly falling off and covering my thighs, but not my knees, my calves, or my bare feet. I am perched on the back of a black couch, legs outstretched. There is a person, hard to see, laying on the couch (visible by an upreached arm in the eighth). I am in front of a wall containing a window. There is a lot of light shining through the window (from a kitchen). It is in black and white.

[What is happening in this picture is that I am dramatically retelling the story of our 12-course meal at Allinea in Chicago where I went to celebrate my 29th, Golden, birthday with my best friend, her husband, and my husband. (He bought a suit. It looked like he should wear it to a funeral. But oh, he was cute to me.) After the dinner we went to a club. It is now about four in the morning and I am explaining our dinner, drunkenly, animatedly, to my best friend's sister.]

There are many things about this series of photos that makes me cringe. My nose, always, for instance, annoys me. It looks so different on film than I imagine it looks on my face. My hair is frizzy. My arms look beefy. My eyes have their typical photo-demonic glare. My chin is dissatisfying. The dress is not nearly as glamorous as I remember.

But, still.

If I may be vain for a moment, there is something I love about the me in these pictures. Something everyone in the room loved. 

I remember being swept up in the story, in describing the deconstructed edibles, the shooters of celery, white chocolate, and horse-radish, the gelatinous Guiness squares laying neatly over beef, the bacon glazed and strung on a bow. I remember the life-love serum that was flowing through my veins. 

I remember my friend saying to my husband, "Are you getting this?"
And he nodded, pointing the camera, still, in my direction.

He captured these images. He thought to pick up the camera. To frame my exuberance. My love. 

Though there are ungraceful angles of my chin and my shoulders seem bulky, there are delicate gestures in my wrists and my ankles that allow me to fall a little in love with myself. My fingers gesture like pirouettes and my eyebrows are ballerinas. 

I was happy in this moment.

This moment, 36 days before my life fell apart.

Of course, that is not the truth.
The truth is my life was falling apart. Had been. Maybe always was. My whole life- a collision course for August 5th, 2007. 
And so, I ask of the picture--was it happiness? Was it love? Was it denial? Was it false?

****

There were many pictures that summer.
The pictures from the summer before were of a different sort. Pictures that stimulated me as I traced my husband's cyber-footsteps even as they nauseated me. Pictures that held me sometimes for hours as I backtracked over url addresses and scrolled through our history, our secret files hidden in other files on the computer.

The pictures of other women, of other women with other men, pulled my husband out of my bed at early hours and kept him watching late at night. 

These pictures, pictures that moved, that spoke, that purred, that moaned, fed the constantly growing sorrow that eclipsed the love of two young people wanting desperately to make best what they could of companionship, of a sort-of love. Of a really-love. 

Let's be honest.

****

Could my husband love me when he could only lie to me? Could he be intimate with me when his addiction was a crueler mistress than I? She was the jealous one. The one making him call every night. The one pulling him ever from me. 

His body betrayed the one he answered to. But did it mean he loved her more?

****

How could both truths of this image exist? How could this be both a picture of my love, my joy and also my denial, my fear? How could he love me enough to capture this series and then love me so little it was no trouble for him to turn me out of the house when I said I wanted a divorce?

****

There is another image of that weekend. Another photo taken by my ex. In it, I am asleep to my consciousness. It is from the previous morning. I am lazy. Reluctant to roll out of the futon. I am unaware I am being photographed. My head turns down toward my left shoulder, my breasts under a pink tank top point at the camera, my right arm is bent at the shoulder and tucking my hair up around the crown of my head, my left arm rests, almost suggestively, against on top of my left hip bone. Again, my nose annoys me. Again I am dismayed by my chin. Again I see the love in this photo. The love that compelled my ex to pick up the camera and capture this image, his wife slow-weekend waking up. 

****

This is why things were complicated.
This is why it was hard to leave. 

Remembering Iran in Black and White, in Glaring Light

John Berger, in his book Keeping a Rendezvous, a compilation of essays on art criticism and life observations, notes that "Painting brings home. The cinema transports elsewhere" (14), meaning that a painting is rooted in the sense of a shared setting between the viewer and the piece of art, while cinema serves to allow the viewer to escape her setting and journey out into the realm of the film directs her to, the surreal, the other-real, the historical-real. A movie moves, it transports, and it changes time, size, shape, and tone. A painting is absorbed whole, in a moment, and the leaps that occur around it occur not through the director's guidance, but in the mind of the viewer.

In thinking of this, I begin to see Reading Lolita in Tehran, by Azar Nafisi, as the memoir that most resembles film, while Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi, a graphic memoir also about Iran, as the memoir that resembles painting. In Reading Lolita in Tehran, Nafisi wanders, she reflects, pontificates, observes and moves closer to and away from the political and personal trauma experienced during the shifting regimes and fundamentalism polluting Iran from the late 70's. Her memoir, to me, hearkens the film Y Tu, Mama, Tambien. There are piercing rays of light bouncing off shores, boys too bright in cars, a woman in white on a balcony, a hut, shadows, dapples of light, a road, leaves. Mostly it is the lighting of the film that most resembles the memoir, the shifting distance and brightness, the way it hurts to look at it, and the way it makes everything hazy.

Nafisi frames her memoir around books. She splits her thoughts into four sections--Lolita, Gatsby, James, and Austen--books I would hardly associate with the restrictions felt by the tightening grasp of Iranian fundamentalism during the time period she observes. She writes about her encounters with her students, of their discussions of the text, and in between, of the atrocities felt in her culture as freedoms are stripped from the people, oddly, as veils are forced to cloak the women. 

The balance in this memoir between personal and academic tips mightily in the direction of academic. Nafisi is a thinker, a fact she asserts herself when she says "I am too much of an academic: I have written too many papers and articles to be able to turn my experiences and ideas into narratives without pontificating" (266). She devotes one page to her terror over the bombings in Tehran when she was pregnant with her second child and says simply, "Tehran was the object of continual bombings and I had become hysterical" (171) but gives three chapters to a class period during which the class put the novel The Great Gatsby on trial as to whether or not it was corrupting society. She does not bring us into her hysteria. She brings us into her classroom.

In contrast, Persepolis, like a painting, brings to its readers an immediacy inescapable. Satrapi portrays no flickering lights. Her memoir is not angles of light shining too brightly, not hazy edges, shadows, or dappling spots on a landscape. Her memoir is black and white. It is instant. Whole. Visceral. Emotional.

Both memoirs, for instance, describe the suicide soldiers convinced to fight for the Islamic army in exchange for a tin key painted gold, the key to paradise. Nafisi describes this in prose. Distant, reflective, intelligent prose. Satrapi frames an image in two blocks of text, at the top: "The key to paradise was for poor people. Thousands of young kids, promised a better life, exploded on the minefields with their keys around their necks" and after the image, the line, "Mrs. Nasrine's son managed to avoid that fate, but lots of other kids from his neighborhood didn't" (102). More powerful, though, is the image, bodies convulsing upwards, lines indicating explosions, and fingers grasping at keys. Satrapi brings us to the horror she felt, without the eloquence, but with lots of guts.

The two memoirs couldn't approach their subject more differently, but there is, of course, good reason for that. Two women do not experience the same thing in the same way. The Iranian society registered differently in two different women who were at two different time periods in their own development and who had two different sets of coping mechanisms in order to confront the Iranian regime.

Satrapi makes it clear that her Persepolis is "A Memoir of a Childhood" and so the memoir hangs on the arc of her growth from childhood to adolescence, ending when she leaves Iran as a teenager to go to school in a safer place. The arc, the structure, allows her to naturally let the political events and her personal response to them shape the memoir. She conveys the experiences she felt as a child by going into that child's emotional make-up. She uses image to bring a sense of immediacy to the reader. She cuts the narrative to a skeleton and lets images convey the flesh. 

Nafisi, a grown woman at the time of these political changes, cannot use the "coming-of-age" structure to build her memoir. She must find some other shape upon which to drape her story. Her selection makes perfect sense for her background. Frame it in books. Let the stories inform her story. 

In a way, Nafisi has the much harder task. And her unwillingness to plunge into the personal emotions she felt is, in a way, noble. She focuses her attention on her students, on her magician, on her encounters with other faculty. She sees herself, clearly, as lucky and does not dwell on her own frustrations for long. Moreover, it is not hard to imagine that as a mother, relying on books for sanity saved her from giving over to the terror that she must have felt during a time in which terror became boring and so it makes sense that this became the framework for her book.

And so, the interesting question is this: which is better? The film or the painting? Womanly and reserved? Child-like and visceral? What is the task of the memoirist? What depths must the writer plunge to? Allow the reader to see? 

Memoir, like art, has no rules. It may, in the future, have patterns, and even evolution, but at this point, there is no rule about what memoir must do other than be focused on what is remembered. 

This is not to say that memoir requires no craft nor academic awareness, but only suggesting that memoir, like visual art, serves many purposes. Movies transport the viewer away from the present setting and into a new setting. Paintings bring the other setting to the viewer. Memoirs can do both and do so under the instruction of their writers. 

For myself, (and I say this begrudgingly) I believe my personal writing must unearth the emotion. It must root in the muck. It must dredge up the dirty guts and reveal them to the reader. I don't like doing it, but there is a certain instinct in me questing for the barest truth, the autopsy of the memory.

We are the century born after Freud. We have adapted in ways Darwin couldn't have predicted. The emotional is not to be scoffed at. It is part of the evolution.


Thursday, March 26, 2009

When We Write

My last journal entry was 2/22/09 at 2:02 in the afternoon. That was over a month ago.

Prior to this journal-drought, I filled journals prolifically over the course of a year and a half, starting in September of '07, and filling up five and a half journals before this sudden, jarring stop.

Prior to this prolific-journal-period, I didn't journal. I stopped altogether. I was in an MFA program at Hamline University and yet I wasn't writing for myself. In the first nine months of 2007 there are only two entries. The first, written in January, a list of events along with corresponding months of every adventure, trip, or holiday that occurred since June of 2004, the date of the next most recent journal entry. The second, written in August I guess, though there is no date, is a three-page entry. On the top of the third page are the words "Can I love Shawn Again?" on the second, at the top of the page are the words "Does Love Exist?" and on the first page of the entry, there are no words. There is only a drawing, a collection of images representing the terrible personal crisis I found myself facing. I did not even have words to articulate my problems. I had only a few scribbled shapes, lines, questions marks, and, as I look closer at the image, I see there is one word. Trust. Crossed out so I missed it the first time.

It is significant to me to realize that after being married for a year and a half to my husband whom I had been with for four years prior to the wedding in December of 2002, I suddenly stopped journaling. We separated in August of 2007. Just before the flood of introspection began and I returned to journaling.

Mark Doty writes his memoir Heaven's Coast miraculously in the midst of and on the heels of loss. His partner ebbs out of life due to the increasing waves of illness that come crashing onto him from AIDS and Mark, somehow, picks up pen, and elegantly, records the journey. This both surprises me and feels natural.

His writing is marked by urgency, honesty, and a wish to preserve, to keep, to hold the twelve-year relationship he shared with his partner Wally. His writing anchors him in the relationship. It keeps Wally close.

In the prologue, Doty writes and rewrites, letting the reader see the rewriting. He says on page six: 
If I write about it as if it's already done, that's because so much of it is--W. is less present, each week spends more time asleep, and is less and less capable of involvement in the stuff of mutual life. We're pushed into a different kind of relation.

Then he adds in parentheses:
(Those sentences were true when I wrote them, but this week he's much more alert--still unable to walk but ready to get out of the house, ready to shop for new shoes and  
magazines...

This rewriting lets the reader see the progression and recession of the disease, the push and pull of the waves hitting them on the shore. It shows that the act of writing, of depicting, transcribing cannot but capture what is true in a moment, from an angle, and then let go of that image and accept the truth is new again.

For this reason, I find myself wondering why I am venturing out into this terrain of memoir and writing about what is personal. I don't like to do it. I lose all orientation in my personal writing. I lose my tight grasp of the control on the pen. I sense neither whether my writing is effective or of any importance to an outside audience, and for me, a highly critical reader used to grading, editing, revising, selecting, and critiquing, this is like being out in the deep purple water of the sea with no clue what swims below my thrashing legs.

My writing will not do anything but capture a momentary truth. And that only if I am lucky.


Doty likewise resists writing, a situation that manifests physically in back spasms and chronic pain. He writes on 132:
There is so much I don't want to write.  I can feel the interior pressure of turbulence, latent feeling opened and invited in--out?--if I begin to speak directly about illness, dissolution, the end of my heart's desire, the wreck of love's body, the failure of medicine. There is so much there to--I begin to write "dredge up" but it isn't at all like uncovering something from which I have recovered, something far in the past. It's that there's all that grief and anger right there and I'd rather not feel it than look at it directly...


I can relate to this feeling. As I began to write last fall, in October of 2008, about the sexual addiction that started filling up my marriage, eventually drowning it altogether in February 2008, I noticed that my fingers ached. My back ached. My eyes hurt. Writing, an even usually that fills me with optimistic creative energy, instead drove me to my bed. I would write for 45 minutes and then sleep for two hours. The keys pounding me back to that place of grief I was working so hard to ignore.

Why did I continue to write about my grief? About my failed marriage ( a term that leads me to plot many more essays in my head even as I type it)? What compelled me to the writing when it felt so painful?


Doty, too, confronts the push-pull, suck-spew power of writing. His writing, an elegy for his partner, his love, I imagine, compelled him because he wanted to preserve his lover, make an altar of their love. This does not mean it wasn't filled with the weight of pain. He writes on pae 205:
To write was to court overwhelming feeling. Not to write was to avoid, but to avoid was to survive. Though writing was a way of survivng, too: experience was unbearable, looked at head on, but not to look was also unbearable. And so I'd write when I could, recording what approached like someone in a slow-moving but unstoppable accident, who must look and look away at once.


I am struck by the way he says writing was a way of surviving. In that sense, I feel like it is survival that draws me most to the field of memoir writing. A woman in one of my classes, after hearing yet another piece about my divorce, said to me, "You know, I've been thinking about your writing." I perked up immediately ready for some praise to assuage the anxiety I have about writing the personal. "It must be really good that you're doing it. Sort of like therapy, right?"

Writing as therapy. Definitely, at times. In my journal, when I finally came back to images, to lines, to question marks, and finally words, writing, I believe, saved my life. It was my life-preserver, the rope pulling me out of a sea of depression, a sea I fully believe might have swallowed me forever.

But what I am doing now is not that kind of writing. The comment stung. Especially as a critical thinker about writing, especially as someone who knows the tediousness of a particular type of narrative. I am not writing to soothe only myself. I am writing for an audience, though I don't know why. It is not meant to be therapy. It is not meant to be an account of the way in which I was wronged (far from it). It isn't really meant to be anything other than shared. I know I am writing for an audience, but only because I am compelled to. Only because I can't do anything else.

Again, I don't want to write about this subject, this, the most personal subject of my life. Writing about the pain of living with a sex addict, of seeing him choose pornography over me (a situation I now realize was not about me to him, but the pain of witnessing it definitely is what it felt like to me, not to mention the pain of realizing the choice wasn't even about me for him, that I was secondary, always, to his addiction) feels like returning to sea on the life preserver after making it safely to shore the first time. I know that I am safe, but I do not want to go back to the storm. Bad things happen out there.


Doty writes bravely in the face of death. He writes though it nearly kills him. As he writes about his final days with Wally, the foot-rubbing, the brief smiles, the simple "I love you, babe" he hears from Wally one last time, he asks, "How can this be written? Shouldn't these sentences simply be smithereened apart, broken in the hurricane?" (259). (Incidentally the tears are running now, down my cheeks.)


After Wally dies, Doty stops writing for a month. He stops.


Grief takes over.




So what I think is this:
We write when we are supposed to, when to do otherwise would mean destruction, when we know we need to; and when the writing would break us open, when we are not ready for the current world to drown, we stop. We wait. We gather our strength.

Then, when we are ready, we pour our story out into the world to swim with all the rest.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

How it Feels Now--

It is not often that the past runs right past you. But today it did for me.

While walking the yorkie-poo on a usual Saturday morning route, to the coffee shop, over to the lake, around the path, and back to the apartment, I saw my ex-husband run past me.

He lives two blocks away from me, so I know there is a fairly high likelihood of running into him. Literally. We both run circles round the lake near our places. Who knows? Maybe we're chasing after each other all the time.

Other images and ideas have been chasing me, too. Ideas I cannot string together into any real sort of coherence just now. Labyrinths. Dorothy and the Wizard of Oz. Tunnels and holes. The idea of falling down the rabbit hole. Alice in Wonderland.

Twice today while at a book store, (pre-coffee shop), I felt my heart jump twice--the first in the entry way seeing a bargain book called the complete works of Lewis Carroll, with Alice on the cover, and later in the fiction section while browsing past the classics and catching a glimpse of Alice in Wonderland out of my periphery. 

I feel a deep obsession coming on. And how appropriate--I leap out of a marriage with a sex-addict right into a literary obsession on the works written by a pedophile. One who wrote a legendary story about a little blond girl getting lost.

There is something to the idea of the journey of female and child protagonists getting lost in a world of fantasy, myth, and confusion. Doors change sizes. Scarecrows talk. A giant flying dog saves a young boy. A boy lives inside a peach and talks to bugs. A girl falls asleep in the opiate haze of poppies. A girl eats a cake and shrinks. A girl finds herself trapped in a glass sphere, a wild party, where no one looks like anyone she's ever seen. 

The ancestors of these modern stories, the fairy tales, set up the archetype.  Children crave candy and are trapped by a witch.  A girl discovers her grandmother is really a wolf. A girl falls asleep after eating a poisoned apple. A girl is forced to marry a beast.

And further back. Psyche finds herself in a cave hidden underground, told by her husband that she can never look at him. 

In all these instances the protagonist is alone. Separated from family. Separated from the world she knew. There is an energy of seduction. There is an energy of confusion. Disorientation. The surreal. The dangerous. The girl does not understand her enemy, but she knows that following the rules she used to live by will no longer work. The people, the creatures, around her do not operate as she has been taught they will.

I felt disoriented when I saw my ex run by. I recognized his breathing first, subconsciously, so that when I saw his back my thoughts were--it really is him! I couldn't believe it. He looked fit. He was running. He looked healthier and saner than the rest of world. I was at my crumpled post-Friday night best. Raggedy. Disassembled.

Could it all, divorce, addiction, really have happened? Did it need to? Why does he look so normal when I am still lost in a world of confusion? A world of strange shapes? Why do I feel like the one who's gone mad?

He ran right by me. No stopping to talk. Did he wonder at the dog by my side? About my new life? 

He ran right past. Bent on a course he knew well and had planned out ahead of time. I continued my own wanderings, lost, I am sure, forever in wonderland.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

A blogger becomes a server and channels Nabokov in her observations...

Well- as a solution to a very concrete problem of lacking personal finances, this particular blogger went out and got herself a job as a server at a nearby restaurant located inside a grocery store frequented mainly by regulars of the elderly, Norwegian variety. They like their coffee black and strong, their lefse thickly buttered, and their seasonings--well, they don't much like seasonings.

As one of the experiences of a new server, I have had the chance to come in at 5:30 in the morning to open up the restaurant and get to know the customers, many of whom order the same thing every day. Lately I have also been reading Nabokov. Speak, Memory.

I know there doesn't seem to be a direct correlation between working at a restaurant and reading the autobiography of a Lolita-writing Russian author, but because I am sleep deprived and waking up at 4:00 these days, it occurs to me that it might be fun to observe the "characters" I have met so far through the eyes of Nabokov- or at least give a sort of Nabokovian description as I interpret his aesthetic from his memoir.

Character #1: Older man, regular.

A man walks over to the counter upon which sit the coffee mugs, water glasses, utensils and various other necessities of the initial ritual of fetching a beverage for the customer. This man does not wait for the coffee to come to him, but walks right up and helps himself to a mug turning on the spigot of the regular coffeepot and grinning at me as I struggle to work the cash register and ring up another guest's meal, a particularly difficult moment for me and so he has me at a disadvantage. I greet the man, a man wearing jeans about ten years out of date, an old gray sweatshirt, and a man who, despite the beaked nose, gray hair (complete with morning cowlick) and skin tired of fighting the war on gravity, was probably once somewhat handsome.
I ask the man how he is.
"Do you really want to know?"
Of course, what I want is of little regard to this man who is intent, as evident by the gleam in his eye, of delivering a joke he clearly finds amusing. He proceeds, despite my protests that no, it's ok, I don't need to know and says:
"I'm ornery and horny."
 And with that he laughs at his own joke (non-Nabokovian me laughs too) and walks over to his usual table, a round table in the back of the restaurant where he hangs out with his cronies each morning sipping coffee and complaining about the state of things in general, and in particular, the service at this restaurant. 

Character #2: Woman at counter, ordering large turtle latte.

A woman with faded brown hair that falls lower than her shoulders and bangs that look like they have been pushed hastily aside in a rush to get out of bed and on with the daily routine approaches the counter, bug-eyed or bleary-eyed, it is hard to say.
I greet her, as bound by my new position as server, and ask how she is today. 
"It's too early to tell," she retorts, clearly annoyed that anyone has the gall to pose such a ridiculous question at the god-awful hour of 7:30. She is such a woman who delights in crushing the enthusiasm in front of her, like she delights in squishing an ant when she sees one walking along the sidewalk slowly in front of her and she happens to be wearing some thick-soled pair of shoes, or perhaps her "outdoor" crocs- the pair that will not come inside, thereby trailing ant remains behind them. 
I know she is this particular kind of sadist because her response to her own retort about it being too early goes something like this:
"I suppose you have to be here even earlier, huh?" (she grudgingly concedes that she is not the only one who has to face morning before it is light and I tell her we arrive at 5:30.) "Well, I saw on my calendar that I think it's this Sunday that we shift over to daylight savings.  I guess you'll be getting here at 4:30, huh?" She walks away after smugly tilting her head toward the plastic lid on her drink and taking a big sip.
She didn't leave a tip.

Character #3: Delivery man, Ghiradelli chocolate-sauce delivery man
I greet the man walking confidently behind our counter wheeling four cardboard boxes on a dolly. I say "How are you?"
He says, "Better each time I see you. You know that's why I come here, right? To see your pretty face each time. You know that too, right? I know you got a man who tells you every day how pretty you are, or you better."
The man continues on despite the fact that I am looking away and working on the cash register again and other servers are rolling their eyes. Of particular note is the fact that this is only day three of my time at this restaurant; I have not seen this man, with his glasses and Ghiradelli jacket and black-and-gray curly short hair. He has never seen me either, so it is impossible to take anything he says seriously. Thus I turn my attention in my mind to the Mnemosyne butterfly, the species that I remembered not so much for the moment in which I caught it, but for the moment my Nanny, Mademoiselle O, sat on it and crushed its wings into six lop-sided and broken pieces. I don't pretend to assume their was any connection between the Mnemosyne butterfly and the Ghiradelli delivery man, but the thought serves merely to illustrate how disconnected I was from the conversation he was having with himself in my direction.

The End--of Nabokovian interpretation...

And now- the why of it all. Why did I choose to have a Nabokovian flight of fancy in thinking about the customers I have met? How is Nabokov different from me?

Well, there is the obvious--He was a Russian writer born in the 19th century before the crumbling of Tsars and Lenin's reign on the world who wrote well and hunted butterflies and grew up in a household full of dozens of dozens of servants all taking care of the personal business of his family. I am an American woman born after Vietnam and before Desert Storm part one who took karate and dance and was held accountable for washing dishes at a very early age. But beyond that-- how do we interpret the world differently? What have I learned from his autobiography? From my own life?

Aesthetically, Nabokov holds his reader at arm's length. His visual description of people and places emerges out of a bounty of details that appear on a page like an image beneath an artist's charcoal pencil. He lets us revel in imagery but resists approaching emotion in anything more than a detached and bemused sort of way, such as when he says of his time in college at Cambridge, "Emotionally, I was in the position of a man who, having just lost a fond kinswoman, realized-too late- that through some laziness of the routine-drugged human soul, he had neither troubled to know her as fully as she deserved, nor had shown her in full the marks of his not quite conscious then, but now unrelieved, affection" (261).  It is a lovely passage, thoughtful and intelligent, but certainly not emotionally engaging. The emotion has been put in an aquarium and Nabokov is instructing his readers of its nature much like a tour guide would do in a natural history museum.

I like that about Nabokov, or at least I like it right now. My own writing has been much more the variety of bleeding onto a page as late, and my emotions are too raw to continue. I want a break. I am tired of describing the gut-wrenching pain of heartache and self-exploration.

Aesthetics aside, Nabokov as a server amuses me to no end. Me as a server depresses me a bit. I'm starting to think becoming a server for me, a woman with codependent tendencies and habits, is a little like sending a drug addict to work in a crack factory. How many times a day do I get to ignore my own boundaries in efforts to please the customer? How many times do I get to smile at a derogatory comment all in an effort to keep things running smoothly and also make a tip? Not that I don't understand the playfulness of the customers or the delivery men, but I feel myself slipping into pleasing-mode and away from the self-containment that Nabokov has in such abundance. Nabokov would make no apologies or accommodations for the customers, but of course, I do.

Perhaps that is why I choose to look at the customers from Nabokov's point of view. Even if in the moment I am wrapped up in being charming and smiling and laughing and putting others at ease, I can always come home and rewrite the scene.